This is the blog for UTPA's ENG 1301.30: Intro to Writing Studies. I want you, as a class, to use this as a resource amongst yourselves. Feel free to discuss any questions you have about the readings, class discussions, or projects.
Monday, September 7, 2009
Haas and Flower reading...
Was I the only one who thought Downs and Wardle's paper was much more interesting than Haas and Flowers??..
3 comments:
Anonymous
said...
Ya, I totally agree with you. Even though Downs and Wardle was kinda confusing, it was still more interesting than Haas and Flower
I thought that It was too repeating and Hass and flower made it more understandable for us students to understand what they were trying to get across...but I still had trouble doing the essays one both sections of reading :/
Well im with Erika. Hass and Flower was actually intresting. While D&W...well i dont know, i kept trying to read it but just ended up staring at the pages.
3 comments:
Ya, I totally agree with you. Even though Downs and Wardle was kinda confusing, it was still more interesting than Haas and Flower
I thought that It was too repeating and Hass and flower made it more understandable for us students to understand what they were trying to get across...but I still had trouble doing the essays one both sections of reading :/
Well im with Erika. Hass and Flower was actually intresting. While D&W...well i dont know, i kept trying to read it but just ended up staring at the pages.
Post a Comment